Disney and Common have introduced the first main AI copyright lawsuit in Hollywood towards AI image-generating startup Midjourney.
In a 110-page complaint filed in U.S. District Court docket in Los Angeles on Wednesday, Disney and Common accuse Midjourney of copying well-known characters from their copyrighted works. The film studios state that they’ve despatched “stop and desist” letters to Midjourney’s counsel to ask the startup to cease producing materials that includes characters developed by the studios. Midjourney has allegedly disregarded their requests.
“Midjourney, which has attracted thousands and thousands of subscribers and made $300 million final 12 months alone, is concentrated by itself backside line,” Disney and Common allege.
Associated: A 74-Year-Old Needed a Lawyer, So He Used an AI Avatar in Court. It Didn’t Go Well.
A few of Disney’s copyrighted characters embrace Darth Vader from “Star Wars,” Elsa from “Frozen,” and Homer Simpson from “The Simpsons,” whereas characters from Common embrace minions from “Despicable Me,” Po from “Kung Fu Panda,” and Hiccup from “Easy methods to Practice Your Dragon.”
Based on the lawsuit, solely Disney and Common are allowed to commercialize these characters and construct a enterprise round them. Nonetheless, Midjourney has allegedly allowed its subscribers to generate photos of characters like Darth Vader in violation of copyright legal guidelines.
Disney and Common included a number of examples within the criticism of AI-generated photos from Midjourney that includes characters from “Vehicles,” “Shrek,” and different motion pictures.
Disney and Common are asking for a jury trial, calling Midjourney’s actions “textbook copyright infringement” and stating that the AI startup “threatens to upend the bedrock incentives of U.S. copyright regulation.”
“Midjourney is the quintessential copyright-free-rider and a bottomless pit of plagiarism,” Disney and Common allege.
Midjourney is a text-to-image AI generator that churns out photos in seconds primarily based on person prompts. It sells monthly subscriptions starting from $10 per 30 days for a primary plan to $120 per 30 days for a mega subscription. The startup was based in 2021 and has since generated $50 million in income in 2022 and $300 million in income in 2024.
Midjourney notes on its web site that it’s “a small self-funded workforce” with “11 full-time workers.”
Whereas Disney and Common’s lawsuit towards Midjourney represents the primary main Hollywood lawsuit towards an AI startup, one other groundbreaking AI case was filed final week. Reddit turned the first major tech company to sue an AI startup, alleging within the criticism that the $61.5 billion startup Anthropic used the location for coaching knowledge with out permission.
AI copyright circumstances can get costly, too. Getty Photos CEO Craig Peters mentioned final month that Getty has spent millions of dollars in a years-long authorized combat with AI picture generator Stability AI.
Getty alleged that Stability AI illegally scraped greater than 12 million copyright-protected media from its web site to coach its AI picture generator. Getty launched the go well with in January 2023; the case is ready for an preliminary trial on June 9.
Disney and Common have introduced the first main AI copyright lawsuit in Hollywood towards AI image-generating startup Midjourney.
In a 110-page complaint filed in U.S. District Court docket in Los Angeles on Wednesday, Disney and Common accuse Midjourney of copying well-known characters from their copyrighted works. The film studios state that they’ve despatched “stop and desist” letters to Midjourney’s counsel to ask the startup to cease producing materials that includes characters developed by the studios. Midjourney has allegedly disregarded their requests.
“Midjourney, which has attracted thousands and thousands of subscribers and made $300 million final 12 months alone, is concentrated by itself backside line,” Disney and Common allege.
The remainder of this text is locked.
Be part of Entrepreneur+ at present for entry.
