
For Christmas I obtained an attention-grabbing reward from a good friend – my very personal “best-selling” e-book.
“Tech-Splaining for Dummies” (nice title) bears my title and my picture on its cowl, and it has glowing critiques.
But it was completely written by AI, with just a few easy prompts about me equipped by my good friend Janet.
It is an attention-grabbing learn, and really humorous in elements. But it surely additionally meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help e-book and a stream of anecdotes.
It mimics my chatty fashion of writing, but it surely’s additionally a bit repetitive, and really verbose. It could have gone past Janet’s prompts in collating information about me.
A number of sentences start “as a number one expertise journalist…” – cringe – which may have been scraped from a web-based bio.
There’s additionally a mysterious, repeated hallucination within the type of my cat (I’ve no pets). And there is a metaphor on virtually each web page – some extra random than others.
There are dozens of corporations on-line providing AI-book writing companies. My e-book was from BookByAnyone.
Once I contacted the chief govt Adir Mashiach, primarily based in Israel, he advised me he had bought round 150,000 personalised books, primarily within the US, since pivoting from compiling AI-generated journey guides in June 2024.
A paperback copy of your individual 240-page lengthy best-seller prices £26. The agency makes use of its personal AI instruments to generate them, primarily based on an open supply giant language mannequin.
I am not asking you to purchase my e-book. Really you may’t – solely Janet, who created it, can order any additional copies.
There may be presently no barrier to anybody creating one in anyone’s title, together with celebrities – though Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails round abusive content material. Every e-book comprises a printed disclaimer stating that it’s fictional, created by AI, and designed “solely to carry humour and pleasure”.
Legally, the copyright belongs to the agency, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is meant as a “personalised gag reward”, and the books don’t get bought additional.
He hopes to broaden his vary, producing totally different genres resembling sci-fi, and maybe providing an autobiography service. It is designed to be a light-hearted type of client AI – promoting AI-generated items to human clients.
It is also a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a dwelling. Not least as a result of it most likely took lower than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some elements, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work getting used to coach generative AI instruments that then churn out related content material primarily based upon it.
“We needs to be clear, after we are speaking about information right here, we really imply human creators’ life works,” says Ed Newton Rex, founding father of Pretty Educated, which campaigns for AI corporations to respect creators’ rights.
“That is books, that is articles, that is pictures. It is artworks. It is data… The entire level of AI coaching is to discover ways to do one thing after which do extra like that.”
In 2023 a tune that includes AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media earlier than being pulled from streaming platforms as a result of it was not their work they usually had not consented to it. It did not cease the monitor’s creator attempting to appoint it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists have been faux, it was nonetheless wildly in style.
“I don’t assume the usage of generative AI for inventive functions needs to be banned, however I do assume that generative AI for these functions that’s skilled on folks’s work with out permission needs to be banned,” Mr Newton Rex provides. “AI may be very highly effective however let’s construct it ethically and pretty.”
Within the UK some organisations – together with the BBC – have chosen to dam AI builders from trawling their on-line content material for coaching functions. Others have determined to collaborate – the Monetary Instances has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.
The UK authorities is contemplating an overhaul of the regulation that will enable AI builders to make use of creators’ content material on the web to assist develop their fashions, except the rights holders decide out.
Ed Newton Rex describes this as “madness”.
He factors out that AI could make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics with out trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.
“All of these items work with out going and altering copyright regulation and ruining the livelihoods of the nation’s creatives,” he argues.
Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer within the Home of Lords, can also be strongly in opposition to eradicating copyright regulation for AI.
“Inventive industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and an entire lot of pleasure,” says the Baroness, who can also be an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford College.
“The federal government is undermining considered one of its greatest performing industries on the obscure promise of progress.”
A authorities spokesperson stated: “No transfer can be made till we’re completely assured we have now a sensible plan that delivers every of our targets: elevated management for proper holders to assist them license their content material, entry to high-quality materials to coach main AI fashions within the UK, and extra transparency for proper holders from AI builders.”
Underneath the UK authorities’s new AI plan, a nationwide information library containing public information from a variety of sources may even be made out there to AI researchers.

Within the US the way forward for federal guidelines to manage AI is now up within the air following President Trump’s return to the presidency.
In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to spice up the security of AI with, amongst different issues, corporations within the sector required to share particulars of the workings of their methods with the US authorities earlier than they’re launched.
However this has now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do as an alternative, however he’s stated to need the AI sector to face much less regulation.
This comes as a number of lawsuits in opposition to AI corporations, and significantly in opposition to OpenAI, proceed within the US. They’ve been taken out by everybody from the New York Instances to authors, music labels, and even a comic.
They declare that the AI corporations broke the regulation once they took their content material from the web with out their consent, and used it to coach their methods.
The AI corporations argue that their actions fall beneath “honest use” and are due to this fact exempt. There are a variety of things which may represent honest use – it is not a straight-forward definition. However the AI sector is beneath growing scrutiny over the way it gathers coaching information and whether or not it needs to be paying for it.
If this wasn’t all sufficient to ponder, Chinese language AI agency DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It turned probably the most downloaded free app on Apple’s US App Retailer.
DeepSeek claims that it developed its expertise for a fraction of the worth of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has raised safety issues within the US, and threatens American’s present dominance of the sector.
As for me and a profession as an writer, I feel that in the meanwhile, if I actually need a “bestseller” I will nonetheless have to put in writing it myself. If something, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI instruments for greater tasks. It is filled with inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it may be fairly tough to learn in elements as a result of it is so long-winded.
However given how rapidly the tech is evolving, I am unsure how lengthy I can stay assured that my significantly slower human writing and modifying abilities, are higher.
